Title: Bt Intro
Description: We do need one...
*DWAN* - November 15, 2006 10:28 PM (GMT)
I've been thinking of intro ideas and this seems to be the best.
It starts with a black screen, then the crystal ( :BT: ) emerges from the darkness. The two beams of green light come from the right moving left into the crystal and turning into three beams. The "Biotech Game Productions" comes from purple(?) smoke(much like the white smoke in the first bionicle commercials). The "taking bionicle gaming to the next level" shines in from left to right. the whole thing comes at the screen fast and then immediatly goes to the game's menu screen.
comments?
-- *DWAN*
Hewkii Inika - November 16, 2006 02:04 AM (GMT)
Actually, we're thinking of making a completely 3D intro video, but that idea works, too.
Iruini Nuva - November 16, 2006 02:35 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Hewkii Inika @ Nov 15 2006, 07:04 PM) |
| Actually, we're thinking of making a completely 3D intro video, but that idea works, too. |
Well, we'll certainly try to do one for the Insurgent's intro, but I'm not certain that the Biotech intro will be in 3D, although that would be pretty cool. Why not just combine the two? It'd look really cool.
-Zach- - November 18, 2006 05:31 PM (GMT)
If you like.. I could unofficially make something and just toss it out there to see if you like it.
Iruini Nuva - November 18, 2006 05:37 PM (GMT)
Dr. Cakey - November 27, 2006 10:57 PM (GMT)
Hmm...that one you used for The Insurgent 1beta was pretty nice, but I think the Biotech :BT: should be included in an intro somehow.
Iruini Nuva - November 28, 2006 09:45 PM (GMT)
Yep, it will be. :) When the old intro was made, I didn't have the Biotech logo thought out very much.
Nickbomb - Overkill PMer - December 3, 2006 12:51 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Zachrias @ Nov 18 2006, 10:31 AM) |
| If you like.. I could unofficially make something and just toss it out there to see if you like it. |
Sounds mucho bueno dude
-Zach- - December 4, 2006 08:22 PM (GMT)
LoL... On that note I did finish the gem. *texture was more complex than you'd think. >_>* I'll have to see if I can get a screen.
Iruini Nuva - December 4, 2006 10:21 PM (GMT)
Just render it and save it as a .jpg. :P
-Zach- - December 4, 2006 10:25 PM (GMT)
LoL... that's what I meant. It's just that i'm not home, and the connection at home -as you VERY well know- isn't all that great. So I don't know if I can get a render uploaded anytime soon. :P
Iruini Nuva - December 5, 2006 11:06 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Zachrias @ Dec 4 2006, 01:22 PM) |
| LoL... On that note I did finish the gem. *texture was more complex than you'd think. >_>* |
I can probably fiddle with the texture if you still need help.
-Zach- - December 6, 2006 05:35 PM (GMT)
lol.. sure. The hard thing is making it reflective and equally transparent.
Iruini Nuva - December 6, 2006 06:00 PM (GMT)
Heh, :blush:, that may be a little more difficult for me. I meant the actual green.
Nickbomb - Overkill PMer - December 8, 2006 06:38 AM (GMT)
Well IN is talking about renaming the company so I personally think we should hold of on this.
Nickbomb B)
Iruini Nuva - December 8, 2006 07:35 AM (GMT)
I still intend on keeping the general theme (green crystal and all), so he can keep going. Plus we'll still be keeping Biotech as at least a division.
Nickbomb - Overkill PMer - December 9, 2006 02:24 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Dec 7 2006, 11:35 PM) |
| I still intend on keeping the general theme (green crystal and all), so he can keep going. Plus we'll still be keeping Biotech as at least a division. |
Ok, then I think we it should start out as a bright green light in the distance and it comes to you like "BAM!" but right before it hits the screen and machine pounds it from the sides and it makes the Biotech symbol
Iruini Nuva - December 31, 2006 06:52 AM (GMT)
That might work. I can do the light effect very easily. The machine may be difficult though.
-Zach- - January 8, 2007 05:44 PM (GMT)
Blender can make some brilliant light effects as well as machines. Even if it's a sprite based intro you could still make a sprite image from a blender render.
Iruini Nuva - January 16, 2007 03:35 PM (GMT)
I actually did that in the intro. for The Insurgent. The little smasher thingies and the doors that open and close were made in Blender.
-Zach- - January 16, 2007 04:22 PM (GMT)
Oh uh. *goes to play insurgent.*
:blush:
Iruini Nuva - January 16, 2007 04:41 PM (GMT)
You said that nearly a week ago too. >_> The models aren't overly detailed, but they work.
-Zach- - January 19, 2007 05:22 PM (GMT)
Yeah well, a week ago the file was corrupted after I downloaded it.
Iruini Nuva - January 20, 2007 05:09 AM (GMT)
Hence why there's a concept known as 're-downloading.' :P
You may also want to check out the intro. in that demo. It's not the most flashy thing, but it may provide some ideas.
Nickbomb - Overkill PMer - January 30, 2007 03:35 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Jan 19 2007, 09:09 PM) |
Hence why there's a concept known as 're-downloading.' :P
You may also want to check out the intro. in that demo. It's not the most flashy thing, but it may provide some ideas. |
I dont think he has that options since his hard drive is probaby overloaded with Halo and Blender :P programs lol
-Zach- - February 1, 2007 02:23 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Jan 19 2007, 10:09 PM) |
Hence why there's a concept known as 're-downloading.' :P
You may also want to check out the intro. in that demo. It's not the most flashy thing, but it may provide some ideas. |
Pish. Or not Pish. Or.. yeah. Pish.
*downloads*
Algernon the infamous - February 3, 2007 04:50 PM (GMT)
If you want my opinion, ditch the Crystal concept. It's not really a very creative logo. Try something a little more original, even if you just resort to shapes anyway- like a sphere made out of scaffholding or something.
Iruini Nuva - February 3, 2007 07:37 PM (GMT)
Well, that kind of symbol was already taken by bORED STUIOs. I've been preferring to find something simple and rarely used. I tend not to see a whole lot of hexagons running around in business logos. Circles show up a lot though: Texaco, B Studios, Pepsi, etc. Sometimes more complex symbols are nice, but they just don't feel as good. Simple and clean often appears more proffesional in the business world. I also want to stay away from overused stereotype symbols. They aren't necessarily common business logos, but they're everywhere just the same. The most obvious one that comes to mind is the dragon. I have nothing against such symbols, but I tend to cringe when I see them more than say "Oh cool!" That being the case, I opted for the one we have now. However, the fact that it's a jewel is a common misconception. Jewels are also somewhat a stereotype symbol. It's a hexagon. Simple as that. It doesn't have to have the faceted finish on it. That's just one of the better looks.
-Zach- - February 3, 2007 09:54 PM (GMT)
Oh well in that case. *scraps the hexagonal jewel* >_>
As for the machine thing, IDK. It's a good concept, but it seems somewhat cliche' for a permanent logo. I would have to agree with Alg on that we need something unique, and uncommon.
*DWAN* - February 4, 2007 01:50 AM (GMT)
I'll try a few designs for a new logo.*get's paper, pen, pencil, ruler, watercolor pencils, and scanner*
-- *DWAN*
Algernon the infamous - February 4, 2007 03:27 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Feb 3 2007, 12:37 PM) |
| Well, that kind of symbol was already taken by bORED STUIOs. I've been preferring to find something simple and rarely used. I tend not to see a whole lot of hexagons running around in business logos. Circles show up a lot though: Texaco, B Studios, Pepsi, etc. Sometimes more complex symbols are nice, but they just don't feel as good. Simple and clean often appears more proffesional in the business world. I also want to stay away from overused stereotype symbols. They aren't necessarily common business logos, but they're everywhere just the same. The most obvious one that comes to mind is the dragon. I have nothing against such symbols, but I tend to cringe when I see them more than say "Oh cool!" That being the case, I opted for the one we have now. However, the fact that it's a jewel is a common misconception. Jewels are also somewhat a stereotype symbol. It's a hexagon. Simple as that. It doesn't have to have the faceted finish on it. That's just one of the better looks. |
Dragons are not common logos. They tend to be too complex for practical usage.
In my opinion, complexity is attractive, so long as it's not overdone. Simple logos- like a crystal type thing- are too mundane. As you say, popular logos are simple, and in order to be unique, some complexity is nessesary. Simplicity is no longer beautiful.
I'm not designing your logo, obviously, but in my opinion, you would be far better off with something slightly less easy to forget.
Nickbomb - Overkill PMer - February 4, 2007 06:05 AM (GMT)
How about a cross with raptor bird in the BG in the background?
Iruini Nuva - February 4, 2007 05:07 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Algernon the infamous @ Feb 3 2007, 08:27 PM) |
| QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Feb 3 2007, 12:37 PM) | | Well, that kind of symbol was already taken by bORED STUIOs. I've been preferring to find something simple and rarely used. I tend not to see a whole lot of hexagons running around in business logos. Circles show up a lot though: Texaco, B Studios, Pepsi, etc. Sometimes more complex symbols are nice, but they just don't feel as good. Simple and clean often appears more proffesional in the business world. I also want to stay away from overused stereotype symbols. They aren't necessarily common business logos, but they're everywhere just the same. The most obvious one that comes to mind is the dragon. I have nothing against such symbols, but I tend to cringe when I see them more than say "Oh cool!" That being the case, I opted for the one we have now. However, the fact that it's a jewel is a common misconception. Jewels are also somewhat a stereotype symbol. It's a hexagon. Simple as that. It doesn't have to have the faceted finish on it. That's just one of the better looks. |
Dragons are not common logos. They tend to be too complex for practical usage.
In my opinion, complexity is attractive, so long as it's not overdone. Simple logos- like a crystal type thing- are too mundane. As you say, popular logos are simple, and in order to be unique, some complexity is nessesary. Simplicity is no longer beautiful.
I'm not designing your logo, obviously, but in my opinion, you would be far better off with something slightly less easy to forget.
|
I'm not going to argue about dragons permeation through culture. Let's just say they're everywhere - not necessarily in logos, but everywhere nonetheless.
True, true. But I'm still at a loss for ideas. >_<
| QUOTE (Nickbomb) |
| How about a cross with raptor bird in the BG in the background? |
:blink:
Nickbomb - Overkill PMer - February 4, 2007 06:46 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Feb 4 2007, 09:07 AM) |
| QUOTE (Algernon the infamous @ Feb 3 2007, 08:27 PM) | | QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Feb 3 2007, 12:37 PM) | | Well, that kind of symbol was already taken by bORED STUIOs. I've been preferring to find something simple and rarely used. I tend not to see a whole lot of hexagons running around in business logos. Circles show up a lot though: Texaco, B Studios, Pepsi, etc. Sometimes more complex symbols are nice, but they just don't feel as good. Simple and clean often appears more proffesional in the business world. I also want to stay away from overused stereotype symbols. They aren't necessarily common business logos, but they're everywhere just the same. The most obvious one that comes to mind is the dragon. I have nothing against such symbols, but I tend to cringe when I see them more than say "Oh cool!" That being the case, I opted for the one we have now. However, the fact that it's a jewel is a common misconception. Jewels are also somewhat a stereotype symbol. It's a hexagon. Simple as that. It doesn't have to have the faceted finish on it. That's just one of the better looks. |
Dragons are not common logos. They tend to be too complex for practical usage.
In my opinion, complexity is attractive, so long as it's not overdone. Simple logos- like a crystal type thing- are too mundane. As you say, popular logos are simple, and in order to be unique, some complexity is nessesary. Simplicity is no longer beautiful.
I'm not designing your logo, obviously, but in my opinion, you would be far better off with something slightly less easy to forget.
|
I'm not going to argue about dragons permeation through culture. Let's just say they're everywhere - not necessarily in logos, but everywhere nonetheless.
True, true. But I'm still at a loss for ideas. >_<
|
Hmm, you need those pies in your face now more than ever V_V (long story)
| QUOTE (Nickbomb) |
How about a cross with raptor bird in the BG in the background?
| QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Feb 4 2007, 09:07 AM) | | :blink: |
|
Yeah, or a flaming dove sitting on the top of the cross.
Algernon the infamous - February 5, 2007 04:51 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Feb 4 2007, 10:07 AM) |
| QUOTE (Algernon the infamous @ Feb 3 2007, 08:27 PM) | | QUOTE (Iruini Nuva @ Feb 3 2007, 12:37 PM) | | Well, that kind of symbol was already taken by bORED STUIOs. I've been preferring to find something simple and rarely used. I tend not to see a whole lot of hexagons running around in business logos. Circles show up a lot though: Texaco, B Studios, Pepsi, etc. Sometimes more complex symbols are nice, but they just don't feel as good. Simple and clean often appears more proffesional in the business world. I also want to stay away from overused stereotype symbols. They aren't necessarily common business logos, but they're everywhere just the same. The most obvious one that comes to mind is the dragon. I have nothing against such symbols, but I tend to cringe when I see them more than say "Oh cool!" That being the case, I opted for the one we have now. However, the fact that it's a jewel is a common misconception. Jewels are also somewhat a stereotype symbol. It's a hexagon. Simple as that. It doesn't have to have the faceted finish on it. That's just one of the better looks. |
Dragons are not common logos. They tend to be too complex for practical usage.
In my opinion, complexity is attractive, so long as it's not overdone. Simple logos- like a crystal type thing- are too mundane. As you say, popular logos are simple, and in order to be unique, some complexity is nessesary. Simplicity is no longer beautiful.
I'm not designing your logo, obviously, but in my opinion, you would be far better off with something slightly less easy to forget.
|
I'm not going to argue about dragons permeation through culture. Let's just say they're everywhere - not necessarily in logos, but everywhere nonetheless.
True, true. But I'm still at a loss for ideas. >_<
| QUOTE (Nickbomb) | | How about a cross with raptor bird in the BG in the background? |
:blink:
|
Yes, which gives a draconic logo the benefit of instant recognition.
And, to Nickbomb:
RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS IN LOGOS = BAD!!
wolf waltzing - February 5, 2007 07:41 PM (GMT)
Well, sry Alg but I'm gonna mention another religious symbol, lol (though often seen in pagan stories as well, so not as bad for agnostics and athiests, etc)
The crow or raven (just blackbird I guess) is a symbol of reawakenment and revival--a jumpstart, if you will, of (spiritual) energy in people--in Judaism (and in relation Christianity).
The blackbird has found it's way in popular culture as well, but as a symbol of death--not reawakening--or as a sign of war (taken only because of the fact that it is black and a dove which stands for peace is white...not really in many ancient stories as being so unless you count the valkyries).
Furthermore, the blackbird has also symbolized omens (of all kinds, no just as death or downfall). In many Welsh/Irish myth the blackbird was a lookout and a bringer of news (good or bad). Similarly in Greek/Roman mythology it warned a dude(uhg, forgot his name) about his love's betrayal (and unrelatedly was turned black for being the messenger of bad news).
Game related: I think a few other gamemakers have had it in their logo--but always as dark and disturbing (like with someone's eyeball hanging out of their beaks...eww). Never as a creature of beauty and intelligence.
In some stories of King Arthur the blackbird is noted for it's intelligence and is somehow connected to the game of chess.
sidenote: It's also known as a creature of harsh justice--read the end of the Cinderella story as written by the Grimm Brothers.
Algernon the infamous - February 6, 2007 04:39 PM (GMT)
A crow would actually be a pretty cool logo, and there's no real religious implication. I like it.
wolf waltzing - February 6, 2007 07:05 PM (GMT)
But I think it could (and should) have some religious connotations to it. So, maybe mix a few symbols...crow and cross perhaps...I dunno. (Sorry, my [edited] agnostic friend).
Also, armor of God symbol seems pretty neat too.
Crosses are actually used extensively in wiccan/pagan stuff now (I shop in goth shops...). So maybe some other way of getting the point across.
But again I like crows. They're beautiful creatures with scarily high intellect. Plus they can make a game out of anything--using a straw on a roof to hit an acorn around to each other for example. Anyway, I've said too much and began to ramble.
Algernon the infamous - February 6, 2007 09:24 PM (GMT)
First of all, I'm not an Atheist. Second of all, religious logos are bad because you alienate potential fans. Should some tension arise between Christians and Muslims, Muslim fans of a Christian community may feel out of place. It's best to avoid religion and politics AS MUCH AS POSSOBLE. Do you intend to prevent Atheist gamers from participating in your community? No? Then don't make them feel unwelcome with religious signs.
I'm not in charge here, but for your own sake, consider my opinion on this matter.
*DWAN* - February 6, 2007 09:27 PM (GMT)
I believe my religion comes first. Not my work. If people are turned away then that's what they'll do ;) . We may get people to come and they learn more about God and the Christian ways. That would make me very happy.
I like your crow idea. I'll add it to my 'to sketch list'.
-- *DWAN*